A- de 2019
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
✓Claimant Estercilia Simanca Pushaina
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- No es oportunidad para corregir o modificar demanda rechazada
- Inexistencia de argumentación, razonamiento o motivación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por cuanto en el escrito de corrección el cargo formulado continuó sin observar la claridad, especificidad, pertinencia y suficiencia requeridos para iniciar un juicio de validez de la disposición acusada.
Luego de verificar la improcedencia del recurso de súplica, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió CONFIRMAR el auto cuestionado.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto de 18 de octubre de 2019 dictado por el magistrado sustanciador Alberto Rojas Rios, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda identificada con el numero de radicacion D-13470.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.